letters
to an unknown audience
It's a bit suspicious when a philosopher, or anyone writing 'philosophy,' throws a definite article in front of a commonplace phrase and starts inquiring into its essence. What if it doesn't have an essence? What if it's just a phrase? What if it's used loosely, improvisationally, or associatively? What if its function is merely to lend a certain air to a described thing?
Yeah, to lend an air.
Comments
Howdy, I sow Your link at one page and I want to say only - i agree with You and dont forget keep up the good working!
—posted by blonde milf at May 17, 2006 7:49 AM
Good day! Thanks for your last post. Even if I have slightly different point of view I realy appreciate what have you put on your website. Good job, take care.
—posted by calling cards at May 20, 2006 6:59 PM
Post a comment